A 6x6 black bar across the top. A 2x2 white bar across the top.

Search this website using Google
 
The Royal Society of New South Wales Title
Home  News & Events Lectures & Meetings Membership Publications Library Awards The Society Links

TALKS

Details of our talks can be found here.

Sydney Meetings

Sydney Meetings 2010
Sydney Meetings 2009
Sydney Meetings 2008
Sydney Meetings 2007
Sydney Meetings 2006
Sydney Meetings 2005
Sydney Meetings 2004
Sydney Meetings 2003
Sydney Meetings 2002
Sydney Meetings 2001
Sydney Meetings 2000
Sydney Meetings 1999
Sydney Meetings 1998

Southern Highlands Branch Meetings

SHB Meetings 2006
SHB Meetings 2005
SHB Meetings 2004
SHB Meetings 2003
SHB Meetings 2002
SHB Meetings 2001
SHB Meetings 1999

Pollock Lecture 2006

Can the Physicists' Description of Reality Be Considered Complete?

Nobel Laureate Professor Brian Josephson, Cambridge University

Date: Friday, 17th March, 2006
Time: 6:30 pm
Venue: The Eastern Avenue Lecture Theatre, Sydney University (about 100m from the City Road gate)

The Pollock Lecture is jointly organised about every three years by the Royal Society of NSW and the University of Sydney. It is given in memory of James Arthur Pollock who was Professor of Physics at Sydney University 1999-1922. This year the lecture was in conjunction with the Australian Institute of Physics and was delivered by the Nobel Prize winning physicist Professor Brian Josephson of Cambridge University. It was to have been held in the Eastern Avenue Lecture Theatre at Sydney University but the audience of over 400 so far exceeded expectations that the venue was shifted to the larger Auditorium A group of about 30 went on to dinner with Professor Brian Josephson and his wife Carol.

ABSTRACT

In his book "Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge", Niels Bohr argued that because of the uncertainty principle quantum methodology might not be applicable to the study of the ultimate details of life. Delbruck disagreed, claiming that biosystems are robust to quantum disturbances, an assertion that is only partially valid rendering Bohr's argument still significant, even though normally ignored. The methods of the quantum physicist and of the biological sciences can be seen to involve two alternative approaches to the understanding of nature that can usefully complement each other, neither on its own containing the full story. That full story, taking into account the biological/cognitive/semiotic perspective, may involve anomalies that are incomprehensible from the standard physicist's point of view. It provides a fascinating challenge for the future of physics.

BIOGRAPHICAL NOTES

Professor Brian Josephson FRS is Professor of Physics at the University of Cambridge. While a graduate student he predicted that currents could tunnel with no resistance through an insulating barrier between two superconductors, for which prediction he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1973. Since then he has been mainly concerned with the question of the logic of brain functioning, as well as being interested in a number of topics that have become the subject of "pathological disbelief". He was one of the instigators of the web site http://www.archivefreedom.org, which publicises cases of the bureaucratic censorship of research that does not fit in with conventional thinking.

Enquiries:
Syd. Uni.: Chindy 9351 2537 or b.james@physics.usyd.edu.au
Royal Society of NSW: 9036 5282 or 9419 6877 or j.kelly@physics.usyd.edu.au
Aust. Inst. Physics: Fred Osman 4736 0750 or f.osman@uws.edu.au